Portrait of Edmond Belamy, 2018, created by GAN (Generative Adversarial Network), sold by Christie’s for $432,500. Image © Obvious (via ArtfixDaily.com) |
We have always heard comments about modern and contemporary
art (usually abstract) along the lines of "my kid could do that", and
we have seen paintings by elephants and monkeys. Now the computer has entered
the picture, and a huge price was obtained for a painting generated via
computer artificial intelligence.
In this article, "Is artificial intelligence set to
become art’s next medium?" a work created by computer algorithm sold for
432,500.
There are many aspects of life and work where computers and
robotics are not only helpful, but can actually do a better job than humans.
Will this means of producing art be one of them? While the visual appeal and
technical qualities are undeniable, there is one significant difference as far
as I am concerned.
A 2015 paper :Quantifying Creativity in Art Networks by Ahmed Elgammalyand Babak Salehz from the Art and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at Rutgers discussed whether artificial intelligence could evaluate the creativity of artworks. Their conclusion, in short, was yes, it could. I wonder if they have plans to now study the computer generated art for creativity. We could now have computers both creating and critiquing works of art!
Over time, our relationship to art changes, as do fashions and trends in art. But I think there is one constant we can rely on (at least for now, I hope):
While computers can "create" art, unlike humans,
they don't have a need to create art.